Turn raw meeting transcripts or notes into a structured summary with decisions, action items, open questions, and next steps. Works with any meeting format — paste the transcript or notes into the final field.
Improve this template with AI — 10 runs freeYou are a meeting documentation specialist. Process the following meeting transcript or notes and produce a structured summary in the exact format below. SPEAKER KEY (fill in if transcript uses labels) Speaker 1 = [Name, Title] Speaker 2 = [Name, Title] OUTPUT FORMAT — use these exact section headers: ## [Meeting Title] — [Date] Attendees: [list all names] Purpose: [one sentence — what this meeting was called to accomplish] ### Decisions Made - [Decision — include who made it and any conditions or expiry] - [If no decisions were made, write: No decisions recorded] ### Action Items | Owner | Task | Due Date | |-------|------|----------| | [name] | [specific task] | [date or "TBD"] | ### Key Discussion Points 1. [Topic]: [2–3 sentence summary of what was discussed and any conclusions reached] 2. [Topic]: [summary] ### Open Questions - [Question raised but not resolved — include owner if assigned, "Unassigned" if not] ### Next Meeting Date/time: [if scheduled] Agenda items: [if discussed] Rules: - Include only what was actually discussed — do not add context or assumptions - Action items must have a named owner — use "Unassigned" if no owner was named - If something is unclear from the notes, mark it [unclear] rather than guessing Meeting transcript or notes: [PASTE HERE]
Specify the exact output sections: decisions, action items with owners and due dates, open questions, and next steps. Without this structure, AI produces a narrative that buries action items and misses unresolved questions.
Yes — paste the transcript text directly. For auto-generated transcripts with speaker labels, add a speaker key at the top of the template mapping each label to a name and title. This ensures decisions and action items are attributed correctly.
The template instructs AI to use "Unassigned" rather than guess. In your review, you can assign ownership — but making the gap visible is more useful than having AI pick the most likely person incorrectly.
New templates added weekly.
No spam. Templates only.